|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
75
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 01:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
So let me get this straight.
You're pissed at loosing a shitfit bhaal to a well tanked rattlesnake while flying solo.
On sisi.
I have some advice you should follow friend, before you start commenting on the state of mods in eve:
1) Grow some balls and fight on tranq 2) Learn to fit ships. 3) Don't go crying to CCP if you loose a fight. It won't work and just makes you look pathetic. 4) Don't fly what you cant afford to loose (emotionally as well as financially) |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
75
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 01:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
also OP his "pathetic 150 dps **** fit" is apparently better than yours. You even have the lossmail to prove it. |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
75
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 01:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sang-in Tiers wrote:Yea well Amarr stuff sucks, its as simple as that. Laser suck, armor tanking sucks. End of.
Show me a bs with 90k raw shields that does 600 dps before drones at 50k with full damage 90% of the time. Might believe you then. |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
76
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 01:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
Freezehunter wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:So let me get this straight.
You're pissed at loosing a shitfit bhaal to a well tanked rattlesnake while flying solo.
On sisi.
I have some advice you should follow friend, before you start commenting on the state of mods in eve:
1) Grow some balls and fight on tranq 2) Learn to fit ships. 3) Don't go crying to CCP if you loose a fight. It won't work and just makes you look pathetic. 4) Don't fly what you cant afford to loose (emotionally as well as financially) How about you shove your advice up your ass? Judging by your killboard all you do is fly in drake swarm fleets. Don't give PVP advice when all you do is blob in a drake and count on 50 fleetmates to kill your enemies. Try giving advice when you use armor tanks, buffers, ECM, painters, webs, scramblers, neutralizers, nosferatus, cap micromanagement, speed tanks and turrets, not the most noob PVP friendly ship in the game whose only skill requirement is pressing F1.
Lmfao if you say so dude because i don't have a slave set in and am not flying around in my geddon as we speak. And not on sisi either. But ok then lets go through you're list: armor tanks.... covered buffer tanking: moot as drakes do this you moron ecm: falcon alt best alt painters: sure on my bomber, useful for **** all else webs and scrams: you know every one day old newbie in null uses these? neuts: hurricanes maybe? or my bhaal perhaps? nosferatus: pretty pointless these days except on frigs or if you have a spare high on a shield ship to keep you're hardeners running. cap micromanagement: cheek to talk with you're cap boosterless amarr battleship speed tanks: on a battleship? really? turrets: im not even dignifying that with an answer
TL:DR OP is ********, if you're going to bring someones killboard stats to an argument do you're research better than him.
EDIT: for the record when i do do drakeblobs. 50? you do the CFC a disservice sir. Try 500. |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
76
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 01:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
Sang-in Tiers wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:Sang-in Tiers wrote:Yea well Amarr stuff sucks, its as simple as that. Laser suck, armor tanking sucks. End of. Show me a bs with 90k raw shields that does 600 dps before drones at 50k with full damage 90% of the time. Might believe you then. The benefits of other weapon systems and shield tanking are bigger, lasers needs a fix...
I disagree about shields but yes lasers could use a little love. |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
76
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 01:55:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sang-in Tiers wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:Sang-in Tiers wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:Sang-in Tiers wrote:Yea well Amarr stuff sucks, its as simple as that. Laser suck, armor tanking sucks. End of. Show me a bs with 90k raw shields that does 600 dps before drones at 50k with full damage 90% of the time. Might believe you then. The benefits of other weapon systems and shield tanking are bigger, lasers needs a fix... I disagree about shields but yes lasers could use a little love. It's funny how almost noone disagrees with that fact and yet CCP doesn't seem to notice or care. :<
Its situational to be honest. Some areas armor is better, some shield. |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
76
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 01:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Freezehunter wrote: Crap damage types. Crap tracking (when lasers IRL can shoot down missiles going mach 5) Huge cap usage.
Meeeeh.
Enormous base Damage. (2 Heatsinks on a Hellcat give you ~900dps) Fit on wonderful ships. Ships that are designed to deal with the Cap use. Spectacular damage projection. The damage types aren't really a problem either, since most people patch their holes (Therm is usually the heardest to patch, btw). If Lasers are broken, why are Hellcats and AHAX fairly wonderful fleetcomps.
This.
They could do with a slight pg req. reduction though ;P. |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
76
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 02:08:00 -
[8] - Quote
Sang-in Tiers wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Freezehunter wrote: Crap damage types. Crap tracking (when lasers IRL can shoot down missiles going mach 5) Huge cap usage.
Meeeeh.
Enormous base Damage. (2 Heatsinks on a Hellcat give you ~900dps) Fit on wonderful ships. Ships that are designed to deal with the Cap use. Spectacular damage projection. The damage types aren't really a problem either, since most people patch their holes (Therm is usually the heardest to patch, btw). Enormous base damage? wat... "Fit on wonderful ships. Ships that are designed to deal with cap use"... loal, yes thats why you can run out of cap by just running your turrets on a battleship in a few minutes. :D EDIT: How often do you actually fly Amarr in PVP, tell me. Cameron Cahill wrote: Its situational to be honest. Some areas armor is better, some shield.
Was talking about the laser part, if they fixed tracking it would be quite okay I guess.
On smalls yes but i can deal with the tracking if i can fit heavy pulses and a 1600 plate to my harbinger. or a full rack of tachyons on any t1 bs without more than 1 fitting mods. |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
76
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 02:14:00 -
[9] - Quote
Freezehunter wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Freezehunter wrote: Crap damage types. Crap tracking (when lasers IRL can shoot down missiles going mach 5) Huge cap usage.
Meeeeh.
Enormous base Damage. (2 Heatsinks on a Hellcat give you ~900dps) Fit on wonderful ships. Ships that are designed to deal with the Cap use. Spectacular damage projection. The damage types aren't really a problem either, since most people patch their holes (Therm is usually the heardest to patch, btw). If Lasers are broken, why are Hellcats and AHAX fairly wonderful fleetcomps. This. They could do with a slight pg req. reduction though ;P. Well to be fair the high PG use makes sense on lasers. Crap tracking does not, pulse lasers should track even better than blasters or at least a little better than Autocannons. Right now they are at just about Railgun level and that is weird. Never understood why lasers in Eve don't have near perfect tracking, they are energy beam weapons (light of speed hitting), lasers IRL have amazing tracking just like CIWS miniguns. The downside to lasers would totally be justified if they at least had blaster-level tracking. But enough about lasers needing a buff, lets return to bitching about ASB being OP now.
You're talking lore not mechanics. It may make sense but its unbalanced. But if you're going to have that argument targeting computers would be able to hit almost anything with almost anything at 1k+ out so irl arguments about spaceship gun tracking are kind of daft. |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
76
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 02:25:00 -
[10] - Quote
Freezehunter wrote:
Now you are talking about balance when you call me a ******** whiner for complaining that there is a mod in the game that can take a rattlesnake from 5% shield to 100% shield 5 times in a row.
Hypocrite much?
I'm suggesting a change that would 'probably' be beneficial to the game. I work around the current state of affairs instead of loosing one fight against ship fitted with a mod due to my own ineptitude then go ***** about how its op and needs nerfed " NOW BECAUSE MY AWSOME PIRATE BS THAT I'M TOO MUCH OF A WIMP TO FLY ON THE REAL SERVER SHOULD BE AN AUTOMATIC I WIN BUTTON WAH etcetc." |
|
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
76
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 02:34:00 -
[11] - Quote
Also lol OP bringing up my kb stats 138 kills with losses being almost exclusively frigs with some very badly fit gallente bs thrown in. Very impressive... |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
76
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 02:38:00 -
[12] - Quote
On fleet ops sure. You really think we don't do other pvp? But even if all i did was spam f1 in boat fleets my point would still stand and you still wouldn't be able to fit ships :) |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
76
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 02:55:00 -
[13] - Quote
Freezehunter wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:Also lol OP bringing up my kb stats 138 kills with losses being almost exclusively frigs with some very badly fit gallente bs thrown in. Very impressive... Of course you never lose ships when you have 500 other friends that can get killed instead around you. That's like winning the lottery. Don't try to use that bullshit "i am a better PVPer because I never die" crap with me, I used to do blob warfare and I know how those work. And also don't use the "get some balls and PVP on TQ" bullshit either. When you do blob warfare you have almost 0 risk of losing your ship and even if you do you get reimbursed. Try doing some small gang/solo PVP and then come to me and call me a coward or ***** or what the **** ever after you lose 50 bils worth of ships to overpowered crapfits after a while. In 3 years of blob warfare I died once or twice and got a few hundred bils in "kills". What I am trying to say is, don't brag about how awesome your KB stats are when they were made exclusively by blobbing or having over 10 people assisting you.
1 fail ninja edit 2 YOU started the kb thing 3 if you'd looked at it you'd see i do do small gang 4 if you're loosing ships to **** fits thats you're fault dude no one elses. |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
76
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 03:03:00 -
[14] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Freezehunter wrote:Cameron Cahill wrote:So let me get this straight.
You're pissed at loosing a shitfit bhaal to a well tanked rattlesnake while flying solo.
On sisi.
I have some advice you should follow friend, before you start commenting on the state of mods in eve:
1) Grow some balls and fight on tranq 2) Learn to fit ships. 3) Don't go crying to CCP if you loose a fight. It won't work and just makes you look pathetic. 4) Don't fly what you cant afford to loose (emotionally as well as financially) How about you shove your advice up your ass? Judging by your killboard all you do is fly in drake swarm fleets. Don't give PVP advice when all you do is blob in a drake and count on 50 fleetmates to kill your enemies. Try giving advice when you use armor tanks, buffers, ECM, painters, webs, scramblers, neutralizers, nosferatus, cap micromanagement, speed tanks and turrets, and you know how to use all the info available on your screen, like transversal, radial and Angular velocity indicator, not the most noob PVP friendly ship in the game whose only skill requirement is pressing F1. And don't dare tell me the guy had a "better setup" when all he basically had to do to kill me was activate his drones (which I popped BTW), turn on his scrambler and cruise launchers and be semi AFK while coming back every 40 seconds to activate his overpowered dual ASB bullshit OP mods, okay? Oh, and before I popped, a Vangel and Vagabond warped in and started attacking me as well, I blew them both up. Skill wise, i would have defeated ALL of them 3 vs 1 no problem, bullshit OP mod-wise, the ASB noob won. Eve ******* sucks compared to how it was in 2007 I swear, WAY more fun and player skill oriented back then. Fancy linking your pro kill board then, since you're raging at some test guy when you sound pretty damn terrible yourself. Also, since when has PvP in Eve been balanced around 1v1?
sigh at OP ninja editing again... and for the record i'm not in test.....
@the OP it apparently was a better setup seeing as he won. Also bullshit on the vangel. |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
76
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 03:12:00 -
[15] - Quote
Freezehunter wrote:
Now you are talking about balance when you call me a ******** whiner for complaining that there is a mod in the game that can take a rattlesnake from 5% shield to 100% shield 5 times in a row.
But of course you support that, you fly in Drake blob fleets and that overpowered ASB crap probably saved your ass more than once.
Hypocrite much?
Are you going to ninja every post dude? and no i have never used an asb except on my ratting zelot. |
Cameron Cahill
Paranoid.
78
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 13:26:00 -
[16] - Quote
Freezehunter wrote:In case you "leet pvpers" didn't notice, my setup was made to kill sub-bs ships and support ships and interceptors, the guy caught me in a belt.
How do you think I was able to kill a Vangel and a Vagabond and all that Rattlesnake's drones before I died?
Unlike some of you fail blobbers and "PVPers" who don't know your heads from your asses and use the same setup for everyone in a 500 man fleet, I know how to fit my ships for solo.
And I would have won 1 vs 3 too if it wasn't for the overpowered ASB crap. What part of " I GOT HIM INTO 5% SHIELDS FIVE ******* TIMES IN A ROW BUT HE JUMPED BACK TO 100% 5 TIMES IN A ROW" don't you understand? I would have killed him five times over along with the 2 other guys if it wasn't for asb being OP now STFU and quit trying to justify the existence of such an overpowered module. I'd like to see an armor buffer tank go from 5% armor to 100% in a few seconds FIVE ******* TIMES IN A ROW. Then you'd be the ones bitching, but when it is in your favor to have something OP OFC you don't complain.
I'd like to see any of you win a fight 1 v 1 against me in ANY ship in your **** fleet drakes or maelstroms.
Also, to the moron that called bull on the Vangel kill, here you go:
2012.07.29 00:32:00
Victim: MimmoB Corp: MimmoB Corporation Alliance: Unknown Faction: Unknown Destroyed: Vangel System: PVH8-0 Security: -0.1 Damage Taken: 10161
Involved parties:
Name: Freezehunter (laid the final blow) Security: 5.00 Corp: Fink Operations Alliance: Eternal Syndicate Faction: None Ship: Bhaalgorn Weapon: Mega Pulse Laser II Damage Done: 10161
Name: subgranules Security: -1.2 Corp: Murientor Tribe Alliance: Defiant Legacy Faction: Minmatar Republic Ship: Rattlesnake Weapon: Ammatar Navy Heavy Nosferatu Damage Done: 0
Destroyed items:
Mjolnir Fury Heavy Missile, Qty: 1500 (Cargo) Valkyrie SW-600, Qty: 5 (Drone Bay) Heavy Missile Launcher II Federation Navy 1MN Afterburner Hobgoblin II, Qty: 5 (Drone Bay) Centii A-Type Adaptive Nano Plating Medium Auxiliary Nano Pump II Khanid Navy Ballistic Control System Corpum A-Type Medium Armor Repairer ECCM - Radar II Nova Fury Heavy Missile, Qty: 1500 (Cargo) Heavy Missile Launcher II Scourge Fury Heavy Missile, Qty: 1500 (Cargo) Scourge Fury Heavy Missile, Qty: 32 Centum A-Type Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane Heavy Missile Launcher II True Sansha Stasis Webifier Medium Nanobot Accelerator II
Dropped items:
Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor Heavy Missile Launcher II Khanid Navy Ballistic Control System True Sansha Medium Energy Neutralizer Inferno Fury Heavy Missile, Qty: 31 Nova Fury Heavy Missile, Qty: 31 True Sansha Medium Nosferatu Mjolnir Fury Heavy Missile, Qty: 31 Inferno Fury Heavy Missile, Qty: 1500 (Cargo)
Id love a 1 vs 1 friend but i'll only fight you on tranq so i guess i wont be getting one...
1mn burner on a vangel? so either its fake or hes an idiot too.
You still dont know how to fit ships. You put two noses on a neuting ship "made to kill sub-bs ships and support ships and interceptors" good luck having cap friend. That and no prop mod and no cap booster make you still an idiot. |
|
|
|